It is clear from the authors' work that streamlining process models is desirable for a number of reasons. An interesting work dealing with the quality of process models and the implementation of the DEMO methodology is the "Empirical Study of Applying the DEMO Method for Improving BPMN Process Models in Academic Environment". Indeed, BPMN, and BORM compete with the notion of the favors of process designers. General user friendliness of the tools designed for the business processes modelling.The issue is undoubtedly a discussion about: During the panel discussion at the EOMAS 2017 conference in Essen, Germany, we were directed to solve another, nowadays burning problem. This notation is currently very well sophisticated, it can be considered as a standard tool in the modelling of the business processes in a wide group of process-controlled organizations. During the determination of the appropriate measures of the process models we focused primarily on the BPMN notation. Our experience has been published not only at the EOMAS conference, , but also in the journals and scientific papers. In the past years, our team has dealt with the design of appropriate measures to determine the quality of design of the process models. This technology has been used by authors in previous years to find a measure of quality of process models, and this year has been demonstrated and applied on BPMN and DEMO models. We hired participants (from the audience) and we used Tobii Glasses for eyes tracking and recording the participants focus. We practically presented the methods used to compare, defined the appropriate equipment of the laboratory and proposed the CASE study model. Workshop dealt with the comparison of BPMN and BORM process modelling tools in the form of Usability study. This invited workshop Methods for evaluating the quality of process modelling tools was a part of EOMAS 2018. Therefore it would be appropriate adding new measures of quality. Conclusions: Analyzed articles and existing quality measures do not reflect all important attributes of business process model’s clarity, simplicity and completeness. Thirty-three suitable scientific publications and twenty-two quality measures were found. Results: It was found that mentioned area had already been subject of research investigation in the past. Method: A systematic literature review was conducted in order to find and analyze business process model’s design and business process model’s quality measuring methods. Furthermore, it will be possible creating a tool helping process analysts designing proper models. If it is possible to find measurable attributes of business process model’s quality, it will be possible to define a different quality maturity levels of business process modeling results. Objective: It can be assumed that properly designed business process models (similarly as in the case of correctly written algorithms) contain characteristics that can be mathematically described. Optimization is mostly focused on a higher efficiency of the process or at least on a better clarification of its meaning and working. If a process is properly described, created models can be used as an input into deep analysis and optimization. The goal of a process analyst’s work is to create generally understandable, explicit, unambiguous and error-free models. Quality of business process models (diagrams) is crucial for any purpose in this area. Business process modeling is undoubtedly one of the most important parts of Applied (Business) Informatics.
0 kommentar(er)
